Matrix Code - String theory is just a theory not a fact?

String theory is just a theory not a fact? View next topic
View previous topic
Watch this topic for replies

Freedom Forums Forum Index » Open Forum

Author Message
()()-(<>)-()-()0

Country:
Joined: 22 Jul 2006
Posts: 10

Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:46 pm

Email this topic to a friend
Read this post

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
String theory is just a theory not a fact?

String theory is just a nice fluffy theory but not altogether a fact.

I still haven't entertained the subject of gravity, as you know; gravity is a mismash of various interactions of periodical and elemental constructions.

So easy us such a subject for moi, while others pull their hair out and agonize to make sense-some may have thought I could not truely bring focus to this subject because of the nature of the cosmos, but you were wrong if you thought so- I don't have a ph.d but my level is kaziltons above any, so how valueable are those pieces of discrimanatory evice papers used to discriminate against ones fellows, a company can teach employees what they will do on a job so almost everyone is a candidate which is fair, will not elaborate on what is truely fair and right, there I go going into the deep end?

My scientific temper brings direction to the subject of finer quantumism as I will demonstrate.

'Matter is neither created nor destroyed yet recycled'-many things have no begining nor end to them such as the time. 'Nor can they be destroyed nor created' They are infinite- Mathematic counting is infinite- String theory is based on a artist and an instrument, the artist plays the instrument to create sound or as the kybalion calls it vibration, so now we are talking the cause and the causer, the created and the creator, ah but who created the creator that creates the created? And thus I tell you that any creator would have to be created just as what it created, this is due to the nature of mathematics as in past present and future at any point a creator would be in a present to create anything and then the thing it created would be part of a future, time would be passing of which time is out of anythings control so time is never created by anything it has no creator in it very nature, time passes in and of itself and connot be stopped, the amount of time it took while time was stopped means that time was still passing even while you thought you stopped a thing called time but it kept passing none the less you see; that is the nature of time.

the player of the instrument creates sound or vibration but it itself is sound so in back of it is a player and the players are infinite- now this is illogical but that is how it is- this is due to the nature of past present and future and time itself-

One asks the question who is the last player or the first cause to every thing and this hurts our mind, well the answer is simple, to say who is the first cause one has to see that cause as existing in the nature of past present and future which all things do- once you understand this law and the law of time then you see that there is never or never can be a first cause.

This is the nature of infinite counting math too.

All is number, even all things in the periodical table, ie, the number of neutrons, protons, oxitrons, magnetrons, and electrons.

What would be the first cause has a causer and that causer has a causer and on and on forever, as is the nature of the law of past present and future-

The nature of a causer and the caused hurts the mind and is illogical by itself because by cause and effect sound is only created by and instrument and a player and thus even the player is sound so who is playing the instrument that is forming the sound or the player that is the first cause? If there are infinite causers this is illogical because at the end of the first causer there is a causer and that causer has a causer how does one ever catch up to the causers of the causers in the infinite scale- well you don't ever catch up to them- so instead of thinking about the causers we think about the mathematics the numbers of the situation, and by doing this string theory remains just a theory while the law of counting and the law of past present and future and even time replaces theory and looks at facts!

If you go on string theory alone or even the theory of a causer and the cause or creator and the created one will get a head ache trying to figure this relationship out because it is an illogical relationship because it implies that there was a first cause and that there was nothing before the first cause, but infact the nature of time proves that there was something before the first cause, but we are talking about the level of thinking of a person that has not considered time and other factors into the equation- the one that hasn't considered other factors thus has a hard time understanding the concept of a creator and the creation and thus gives up, but they have been challenged time and time again because very smart people has said to them who created the creator? That is a step in the right direction, and is precisely part of my piont as to the true nature of cosmos.

The very idea of causer and caused even in knowing of its infinite nature is illogical mind aching, we just have to live with it; we would like for the cosmos to be perfect and nice and logical, but we just have to get use to the fact that it isn't it is very illogical, especially if you concentrate on the concept of a creator and the created of which we know that something created the creator etc.. So thus one shifts atention from a causer and cause and conversions them to coincide with the nature of counting math and time and past present and future and this then brings more logic to the situation. Now we are not dealing in theory we are dealing in actual laws/facts.

We in using reason or cause and effect look for a first cause which is a limited view, but others then say what caused it and what caused the cause that caused the first cause which is only logical- the cause and causer relationship which is infinite in its nature is illogical, so to take the illogicalness out of the equation we just eliminate in a sense the concept of causer and caused and replace the concept with the law of counting math, the law of the nature of past present and future and that of time itself which passes and cannot not pass, i.e. you cannot stop time. Once you make this leap forward your headaches stop, and now you are thinking mathematically. One stops assuming that all sound or vibration is created by a player of an instrument which it is, but you will never see all the players is my point because they are infinite, a player before a player before a player, infinitely or causer before a causer before a causer; so we use the law of counting math, yes it is more abstract but it is better- all of you who asked who created the creator asked the right question, all creators have creators, infinate numbers of them because the creator that created the creator has a creator, how because if all is vibration or sound then the creator which is made of sound is being created by a artist that is playing an instrument that is producing the sound that is the creator, and the creator that creates sound or its creation is the causer of the sound which is its creation. all creations are sound and the creators of the sound are sound too and thus there are musicians making them who are sounds.

No matter how much we try to force a false view of a first cause in a absolute way this is not reality- so instead of thinking about vibration or strings or the artist and the instrument one focuses on reality as in counting math that all is number infinite number and fractions. Each number having its place in the infinite scale or number line or coordinate quadrants.

The book kybalion which comes from ksian-kmtianism which is called hermeticism gives us the nature of the cosmos as in its states as vibration sound and such, and speaks of 'infinite mind' which is the same as reducing all to number, so I know what I am talking about, and thus we are not talking theory but law.

String theory is infintile in many ways in trying to understand cosmos- It is logical that the strings are circular however which implys wholeness of form or super-sub-particle. But what is inside the string, and before a string forms what are those particles like? What is causing the particles that form the strings to come together to invent the strings? Ah, the hard questions. Well cosmic drift and condensation has allot to do with it- basically anthropormorphically all atomic bonds even those formed by super-sub-particles are hands gripping hands or wrists, as in one person can form a circle with their own hands and arms, and two or more people can form a circle with their arms anf hands too.

A law not a theory, the law of infinity's nature, the nature of past, present, and future, and the nature of time; what was before the first cause since it is apart of the state of past present and future where ever it exists and so is its creation and nothing is outside of time no matter where it is, time is passing that is law, and ultra-mega logic; if the first cause has a present which caused a creation and then the creation and creator moved into the future then the causer has a past and the past it had goes on forever and ever you see, plus the fact that the first cause if sound too so who is making the sound on thier instrument? and that one is sound too, and on and on. So we are talk counting math thus knowing this we have the answer of what all is made of in the cosmos, and that is all is number=

(([st]) (hr) ([st][-]ssht)) or

(([(()())(()0)]) (([](<>))(()[])) ([(()())(()0)][-]((()())(()())([](<>))(()0)))

_________________
()()-(<>)-()-()0 [[][]-[]()]

((()())([](<>))([]())(()0)[-][[][]-[]()]