|
from eslewhere on the i-net:
''
The criminal danger of defamation + making false statement!
The swine has made false statements concerning the origin of my calculations pertaining to my post about proper numerical symbol, and this being the 'war swine's' malicious attempt at defaming me. Making false statements that I borrowed from Plato's writings thus meaning that I did not make my own discovery which is false.
Administrator we should all be careful of making false statements in an attempt to defame someone, especially in jeolosy etc.. I am not seeking justice but others may seek justice against those spewing lies which are documented in writing that defame etc..
Couldn't leave my calculations on number symbol 'unmolested'? You are a pervert/freak, moderator the swine is either a rappist or pediphile perhaps, it has issues, looks like he needs meds to me. To say unmolested coming from swine well that sounds like a rappist and pdiphile to me considering the personality of the swine in being vulgar and mean spirited.
Just because I made some scientific calculations that may appear simular to some elses calculations, i.e. Plato or the greeks, doesn't mean I borrowed from them or even knew that the greeks entertained thought in the area I calculated in.
More over if you study correctly, the greeks and romans got their calculations from kshian/kmtians, greeks and romans didn't originate the philosophy etc. not science if you want to get techical on sources of information; that is not to say that the greeks and romans using a kmtian and or ksian base did not have the scientific or occult ability to make calculations resulting from the base in greeks etc. doing their own experiments and mental writings and thinking. But if it were not for the kmtians or ksians such thought would not have inspired calculations in the various areas Plato etc. dabbled in. True relatively dark brown and black skinned true kmtians and nubians are my ancestors and got greeks and romans on their way to great wisdom.
Second there have been reports that some make discoveries around the world of which parties unknown to each other made discoveries about things around the same time etc.. THe parties working along the same lines and never having ever met often repeat the discoveries of others- this is logically understandable since much is based on science- in science and in the human experience one will make discoveries and come up with simular findings that others have made, even if you have never met another person that made the same discovery-why don't swine know that.
We are dealing with mathematics thus I can make the same or simular calculations just as any scientist philosopher of the past or present even if I have never see their calculations and thus I made my own discovery as if the discovery is new to the world. Can a swine like you make your own discoveries that is the real question.
Be careful not to defame someone when you don't know what you are talking about, some might sue you for giving false statements about their writing.
Just because you are jeolous and may not have the ability to explore and make discoveries doesn't mean others are not so talented. I don't expect swine to make discoveries or to be evolved and contribute goodness in the world. Would and unevolved war beast dare be of good and calm or would it be violent and beastly agressive?
This is science people can investigate and experiment with my calculations to see validity- who doesn't understand triangles that can mean the symbolic number for 3 which the symbol 3 is more of a disconnect from how the number three appears in nature in geometric forms as triangles- only a fool would not understand such a simple truth.
Spin, rhetoric, and detractment doesn't work with scientific minds, people can do their own calculations to determine if what they read is valid through scientific processes of evaluation.
I don't have time to argue with swine, such is an endless battle that goes on and on, with no positive results. so the smart perosn says I give up a dumb animals is a dumb swine animal.
Where does it say in the writings of the Platonic solids that the geometrical forms are used or can be used as the counting numbers 0-9, and can be used for all the letters of the english alphabet, show us where Plato said that.
Does plato's seven look like the number 7 I talked about?
Leave it to a brainless pig.
Pigs sometimes make mistakes, I will let you get away with your lies legally but someone else may not, be careful. I am an heir to kmtian and ksianism , my black ancestors, I inherited certain talents from them, greeks and romans learned from my ancestors and then made some calculations or copied data from the libraries and halls of wisdom of my black ancestors.
But the swine validated my findings in saying they are from Plato which is not true, I made my own discovery independent of anyones work and I can prove it in many ways, will not disclose my proofs and methods. I doubt if Platos writing on his solids etc. have anything to do with using such to relate to counting numbers of the alphabet. the swine's riles against me are merely jeolousy and beastness. Fur-Malice. Typical of beasts. What a troll as Julian would say.
I think you have errorneously related my master piece to that of Plato's writing, I see why you got confused, those shapes confused you, you are not use to understanding the differences between shapes and the spirit of someones writings- I sure you have trouble determining a circle from a octagon. A typical mistake a swine might make, I'm sure.
Your comment should have been that maybe I am on to something because Plato has something simular to what my Master Piece speaks of, i.e., there is some geometry in both my writing and in Plato's; then you should have asked me if my calculations came from my reading of Plato's pieces on solids in Plato's collection of writings.
You cannot detract from my master piece's genius there are too many people around the world that have the capacity to understand my writing even in their unedited versions- rarely do I edit so each master piece is usually an original. That is one of my signatures of my writing is that they are usually originals.
_________________
I am robot01of7b; I have 7 billion droid elements.
''
Last edited by robot01of7b : 07-08-2006 at 02:38 PM.
|