Since its in your sig and since a PM would only serve to exclude the rest of the forum, I guess I will start a thread. This seemed like the right thread, since it could certainly deal with news and or politics. If not, move it.

While I am usually all for a little genocide from time to time this one is interesting to me. You seem to have the same sort of beliefs as the extremists do. They have some sort of hate against their enemy that makes them want to destroy said enemy at all costs just as you seem to have towards them. They feel that they are justified in their war just as I am sure you would. So then, what is it that makes your feeling so acceptable to you while theirs is so unacceptable?

__________________

Perhaps he's mocking genocidal tendencies while being dead serious? I don't know how that works, but possibly that is the motive.

Or I could be way off. Then I'll just laugh... very hard, almost choking but not quite. You wish you were that lucky, fuckers.

__________________

I believe the defining factor would be religon, but most importantly the extreme version of Islam. They are quite easily one of the greatest threats we have ever faced, and by no means when I say we do I mean excusively the U.S and the UK. I am reffering to the entire civilized world. These extremeists are barely above barbarians in every aspect, from their offensive tactics to the way they go on a day to day basis. But not just them but a good part of the middle east is stuck in mindsets and prejudices that go back to the dark ages. As someone once called it "the curse of middle east oil", "just drill a hole and we can still survive in the world market". Precisely the problem, its what keeps their worldly attitude centuries outdated and most of their citizens perpetually stuck in poverty.

The suicide bomber, a tactic that trumps even the kamikaze in its deadly effectiveness. At one time I could have sworn there was at least one news reported incident every day, and always the same results '5-20 are killed and many more injured'. The targets sometimes seemed planned, but most of the time they seem like nothing more than random killing of civilians.

I ask you, is there any cause on the planet thats worth the slaughtering of women and children?

No, but the extremeists seem to think so. Under the facade of their religon they lack the simple ability of empathy for a single human that doesnt share their faith. As far as they're concerned there is no "right" or "wrong" just the advancement of Islam.

So what is it you do when you confront an enemy that refuses to negotiate? Simple, you destroy them, because the unpleasantness of eliminating an entire subsect of Islam is not nearly as bad as their view on everyone else.

__________________

Than by implication your beliefs align you with their fate. When the ashes have settled down from this suggested genodice, will you than kill yourself to complete the circle, or are you just as pathetic as those extremists, in being unable to reflect?

Mr U

__________________

The best thing to cause widespread chaos is localized chaos, and what better medium than the Islamic? But I'm not going to say that I want to kill even the ones who didn't do anything. I'd say "Eliminate all who occupy the battlefield" but not those the homes of the people who do not believe in the war.

__________________

That would be law under the Geneva Convention.

__________________

This is one of the things I love about this forum, ive been here so long that its fascinating to go back in time to mindsets and ideas I used to somewhat believe.

__________________

Haha, that's so true Helios.

__________________