Did Cypher have it right?

G.A.O.T.U.

One way this movie could end is that the people and the machines could live in a symbiotic, rather than parasytic, relationship. But could that outcome be the route Cypher tried to take?

Many have suggested that the imprisonement of humans in pods is evil. My fundamental question is "Would pod life be evil if it were freely chosen?"

Over the past centuries, humans have moved from a life that was demandingly physical. Our lives were spent gathering resources for survivial. Along the way, we learned to cultivate rather than just to gather. Eventually, this freed people from 24/7 food production and created a variety of different workers that included clerical, governemental, military and religious groups.

Over time, society has developed and technology has certainly developed. More and more, economists talk less about "labor" and "financial capital" and more about "intellectual capital" (i.e. ideas). This progression suggests that the body is becoming less important and the brain more so.

Might we ever get to a point where our bodies are more of a hindrance than an attribute? Might there be better ways to take care of our brains than keeping them in our cranium? Might that lead to "pods" or "vats"?

Again, if all this did occur, would it be "evil" if we freely chose it?

G.A.O.T.U.
Matrix Warrior

i dont think its evil if we have the choice to be in a pod. after all, that is gods gift to us, free will. we could do whatever the hell we wanted. in a scenario like that though, there would most likely have to be a really good reason to put humans in pods. maybe if the worlds resources had been all used up and the only way of survival would be to put humans in pods, then i'm sure the idea would be considered.

View Full Version : Did Cypher have it right?


It all begins with... - Is the matrix dangerous?...



Thank you for visiting the home of The Matrix - archive home.