k-lynn
I just had another thought that may be of no consequence or may have meaning. I was pondering the 'love' connection that the Architect points out is what makes this 'version' different. How our Neo's connection to the species is 'experience is far more specific'. My mind was dancing across the various scenes that dealt with this love and I thought of the sex scene.
A lot of folks, including myself have pondered as to the relevance of the tribal 'orgy' scene and why it was drawn out so long. So that thought again occurred to me as I pondered if the love scene had anything to do with that, since the two were on going simultaneously. Then a thought occured to me.
The architect points out that 'Your five predecessors were by design based on a similar predication, a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species. I immediately pondered when posting earlier today about this 'function', that the love for 'Trinity' might be 'too specific. That when the Architect speaks of a emotional response, he fully expects the response to be to save all mankind, but instead Neo chooses to save one person.
I then pondered that bond to mankind. The 'mankind' in the matrix is part of the illusion, so I reasoned out them as being a reenforcement for that attachment. so that leaves the people of Zion. But when we see Link talking to his girlfriend, she points out that the Nebuchadneddzar spends less time in port than any other ship in the fleet.
Later when we see Neo walking out the elevator with a waiting throng of people, Trinity tells him 'they need you' and he says 'but I need you.'
Assuming that the 'versions' of the anomoly play out in a similar fashion for whatever reason, then there could have been this style of celebration in previous 'versions'. But in this one, rather than making attachments with the people of Zion, where do we find Neo? In the arms of Trinity, in private. They even made a comment about leaving the celebration before doing so.
A lot of grasping at straws to draw this conclusion, but it seems that when Neo could have been re-enforcing his attachment to the 'species' he was instead building an attachment to Trinity. Perhaps yet another example of how love was not considered or understood by the Architect in his 'measure of control' while sedulously avoiding the burden the anomaly represents to the Matrix.
What do y'all think?
KL
A lot of folks, including myself have pondered as to the relevance of the tribal 'orgy' scene and why it was drawn out so long. So that thought again occurred to me as I pondered if the love scene had anything to do with that, since the two were on going simultaneously. Then a thought occured to me.
The architect points out that 'Your five predecessors were by design based on a similar predication, a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species. I immediately pondered when posting earlier today about this 'function', that the love for 'Trinity' might be 'too specific. That when the Architect speaks of a emotional response, he fully expects the response to be to save all mankind, but instead Neo chooses to save one person.
I then pondered that bond to mankind. The 'mankind' in the matrix is part of the illusion, so I reasoned out them as being a reenforcement for that attachment. so that leaves the people of Zion. But when we see Link talking to his girlfriend, she points out that the Nebuchadneddzar spends less time in port than any other ship in the fleet.
Later when we see Neo walking out the elevator with a waiting throng of people, Trinity tells him 'they need you' and he says 'but I need you.'
Assuming that the 'versions' of the anomoly play out in a similar fashion for whatever reason, then there could have been this style of celebration in previous 'versions'. But in this one, rather than making attachments with the people of Zion, where do we find Neo? In the arms of Trinity, in private. They even made a comment about leaving the celebration before doing so.
A lot of grasping at straws to draw this conclusion, but it seems that when Neo could have been re-enforcing his attachment to the 'species' he was instead building an attachment to Trinity. Perhaps yet another example of how love was not considered or understood by the Architect in his 'measure of control' while sedulously avoiding the burden the anomaly represents to the Matrix.
What do y'all think?
KL